NRC001-M
- Hogsticker2
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 7161
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: NRC001-M
If you look at the inductor width on SS SV stock spool, it's quite wide. Compare it to the width of the Zpi Nrc001-m. Same goes for the SLP SV1000 and SV105 spools - bigger inductor. Then factor in the magnetic polarity of each different reel, and you really don't know what you might end up with.
I thought the Steez SV TW 1016 spool would be money in my SV103 - Nope. The M is a faster spool than the PG, but I haven't compared inductor widths. That's where I always start when contemplating spool swaps. I try to judge the size of the inductors. A good example of this was between my Steez SV103 and Steez SV TW spools. I found the Steez SV103 stock spool a bit choked off, and comparing inductors, the Steez SV TW spool inductor was just slightly smaller. I think the best way to split this is between older and newer Daiwa reels. Old spools typically play well in new reels, but not always vice versa.
It doesn't surprise me that the Zpi M was really wild in the SS SV. I found the Steez SV TW spool pretty fast in it, so the M probably cooked pretty good.
I thought the Steez SV TW 1016 spool would be money in my SV103 - Nope. The M is a faster spool than the PG, but I haven't compared inductor widths. That's where I always start when contemplating spool swaps. I try to judge the size of the inductors. A good example of this was between my Steez SV103 and Steez SV TW spools. I found the Steez SV103 stock spool a bit choked off, and comparing inductors, the Steez SV TW spool inductor was just slightly smaller. I think the best way to split this is between older and newer Daiwa reels. Old spools typically play well in new reels, but not always vice versa.
It doesn't surprise me that the Zpi M was really wild in the SS SV. I found the Steez SV TW spool pretty fast in it, so the M probably cooked pretty good.
-
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 6:27 pm
Re: NRC001-M
Were there any reels you liked the SLP SV1000 in?Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:02 pmIf you look at the inductor width on SS SV stock spool, it's quite wide. Compare it to the width of the Zpi Nrc001-m. Same goes for the SLP SV1000 and SV105 spools - bigger inductor. Then factor in the magnetic polarity of each different reel, and you really don't know what you might end up with.
I thought the Steez SV TW 1016 spool would be money in my SV103 - Nope. The M is a faster spool than the PG, but I haven't compared inductor widths. That's where I always start when contemplating spool swaps. I try to judge the size of the inductors. A good example of this was between my Steez SV103 and Steez SV TW spools. I found the Steez SV103 stock spool a bit choked off, and comparing inductors, the Steez SV TW spool inductor was just slightly smaller. I think the best way to split this is between older and newer Daiwa reels. Old spools typically play well in new reels, but not always vice versa.
It doesn't surprise me that the Zpi M was really wild in the SS SV. I found the Steez SV TW spool pretty fast in it, so the M probably cooked pretty good.
I like the M in my steez sv tw and the pg in my steez A. I have another pg I put in an sv103 but haven't tried it yet.
-
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:34 pm
- Location: NW OKC OK USA
Re: NRC001-M
I have the shallow version (basically a 105 or 1012 spool, I really wish they'd settle on a system for these numbers...) and as you might expect, it was great in the T3, the reel it was designed for. Of course, I think Magforce 3D means almost any spool will shine (or at least function) in that reel.
I also tried it in a Luna 103 and it was just too fast for that reel. It would get really wild unless I turned the brakes up enough to kill the castability. The SLP Steez SV 105 is excellent in that reel, though. It was too tame in the SS SV 103 I originally intended it for.
Lastly, I slapped it in that SS SV 103, and there it remains. It is awesome, awesome, awesome in that reel. It's predictably wild, if that makes sense. I mostly use it on a 65ML rod casting 1/4oz hardbaits and that combo will sling cranks wayyy out there without much effort. I can keep the brakes down comfortably low for the most part and know that the spool will want to backlash at about the same stage early in every cast, but after a quick stab with my thumb to regulate it, it will sing for the rest of the cast as the bait sails off.
I don't remember using anything other than 20# braid with that spool.
This is the way.
-
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 6:27 pm
Re: NRC001-M
Hmm I'm not sure whether I have the shallow or deep sv1000. I'll have to check when I get home. It came with a reel I bought but I had other plans for it. Now I'm kind of wondering how it would perform.poisonokie wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 4:57 amI have the shallow version (basically a 105 or 1012 spool, I really wish they'd settle on a system for these numbers...) and as you might expect, it was great in the T3, the reel it was designed for. Of course, I think Magforce 3D means almost any spool will shine (or at least function) in that reel.
I also tried it in a Luna 103 and it was just too fast for that reel. It would get really wild unless I turned the brakes up enough to kill the castability. The SLP Steez SV 105 is excellent in that reel, though. It was too tame in the SS SV 103 I originally intended it for.
Lastly, I slapped it in that SS SV 103, and there it remains. It is awesome, awesome, awesome in that reel. It's predictably wild, if that makes sense. I mostly use it on a 65ML rod casting 1/4oz hardbaits and that combo will sling cranks wayyy out there without much effort. I can keep the brakes down comfortably low for the most part and know that the spool will want to backlash at about the same stage early in every cast, but after a quick stab with my thumb to regulate it, it will sing for the rest of the cast as the bait sails off.
I don't remember using anything other than 20# braid with that spool.
Anyway thanks for the info.
- Hogsticker2
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 7161
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: NRC001-M
I really liked it in the Tdz for applications where I needed more line capacity. Though realistically for most applications, I never really need more line than what the 1012 holds. I also ran the FX68 1010 spool in my 2nd Tdz for less line capacity.chrisg_sdcf wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:11 amWere there any reels you liked the SLP SV1000 in?Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:02 pmIf you look at the inductor width on SS SV stock spool, it's quite wide. Compare it to the width of the Zpi Nrc001-m. Same goes for the SLP SV1000 and SV105 spools - bigger inductor. Then factor in the magnetic polarity of each different reel, and you really don't know what you might end up with.
I thought the Steez SV TW 1016 spool would be money in my SV103 - Nope. The M is a faster spool than the PG, but I haven't compared inductor widths. That's where I always start when contemplating spool swaps. I try to judge the size of the inductors. A good example of this was between my Steez SV103 and Steez SV TW spools. I found the Steez SV103 stock spool a bit choked off, and comparing inductors, the Steez SV TW spool inductor was just slightly smaller. I think the best way to split this is between older and newer Daiwa reels. Old spools typically play well in new reels, but not always vice versa.
It doesn't surprise me that the Zpi M was really wild in the SS SV. I found the Steez SV TW spool pretty fast in it, so the M probably cooked pretty good.
I like the M in my steez sv tw and the pg in my steez A. I have another pg I put in an sv103 but haven't tried it yet.
-
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 6:27 pm
Re: NRC001-M
Was that the deep or shallow sv1000? (Didn't know there was more than one when I asked)Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:45 pmI really liked it in the Tdz for applications where I needed more line capacity. Though realistically for most applications, I never really need more line than what the 1012 holds. I also ran the FX68 1010 spool in my 2nd Tdz for less line capacity.chrisg_sdcf wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:11 amWere there any reels you liked the SLP SV1000 in?Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:02 pmIf you look at the inductor width on SS SV stock spool, it's quite wide. Compare it to the width of the Zpi Nrc001-m. Same goes for the SLP SV1000 and SV105 spools - bigger inductor. Then factor in the magnetic polarity of each different reel, and you really don't know what you might end up with.
I thought the Steez SV TW 1016 spool would be money in my SV103 - Nope. The M is a faster spool than the PG, but I haven't compared inductor widths. That's where I always start when contemplating spool swaps. I try to judge the size of the inductors. A good example of this was between my Steez SV103 and Steez SV TW spools. I found the Steez SV103 stock spool a bit choked off, and comparing inductors, the Steez SV TW spool inductor was just slightly smaller. I think the best way to split this is between older and newer Daiwa reels. Old spools typically play well in new reels, but not always vice versa.
It doesn't surprise me that the Zpi M was really wild in the SS SV. I found the Steez SV TW spool pretty fast in it, so the M probably cooked pretty good.
I like the M in my steez sv tw and the pg in my steez A. I have another pg I put in an sv103 but haven't tried it yet.
- Hogsticker2
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 7161
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: NRC001-M
I had the deep. The shallow version has an ever so slightly larger inductor than the SLP Steez SV105 spool.chrisg_sdcf wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 4:58 pmWas that the deep or shallow sv1000? (Didn't know there was more than one when I asked)Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 3:45 pmI really liked it in the Tdz for applications where I needed more line capacity. Though realistically for most applications, I never really need more line than what the 1012 holds. I also ran the FX68 1010 spool in my 2nd Tdz for less line capacity.chrisg_sdcf wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:11 amWere there any reels you liked the SLP SV1000 in?Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:02 pmIf you look at the inductor width on SS SV stock spool, it's quite wide. Compare it to the width of the Zpi Nrc001-m. Same goes for the SLP SV1000 and SV105 spools - bigger inductor. Then factor in the magnetic polarity of each different reel, and you really don't know what you might end up with.
I thought the Steez SV TW 1016 spool would be money in my SV103 - Nope. The M is a faster spool than the PG, but I haven't compared inductor widths. That's where I always start when contemplating spool swaps. I try to judge the size of the inductors. A good example of this was between my Steez SV103 and Steez SV TW spools. I found the Steez SV103 stock spool a bit choked off, and comparing inductors, the Steez SV TW spool inductor was just slightly smaller. I think the best way to split this is between older and newer Daiwa reels. Old spools typically play well in new reels, but not always vice versa.
It doesn't surprise me that the Zpi M was really wild in the SS SV. I found the Steez SV TW spool pretty fast in it, so the M probably cooked pretty good.
I like the M in my steez sv tw and the pg in my steez A. I have another pg I put in an sv103 but haven't tried it yet.
-
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:34 pm
- Location: NW OKC OK USA
Re: NRC001-M
I noticed that the label on the case for the shallow says I'ze Factory on it while the one for the deep says SLP. Wonder what's up with that and if it has something to do with the inductors...Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2019 8:57 pm
I had the deep. The shallow version has an ever so slightly larger inductor than the SLP Steez SV105 spool.
This is the way.
Re: NRC001-M
Of recent times I brought some purple spools One of which was an SV 105 and the other an SV1012 they were the same but different and as I looked through my spool case I noticed that the G1 Spools are not only lighter ( they have cut outs in the middle) but the inductor was thinner. I have an ZPI M spool in a TDZ R+ and in a IS79 and its okay but to me the PG out shines the M spool. Maybe I am not doing something right but I'll go back to trying out different things. Right now my order of preference is the Kahen, PG, G1, M spool
Has anyone used braid on the M spool? I need some 40lb braid and may try it with the M spool.
Has anyone used braid on the M spool? I need some 40lb braid and may try it with the M spool.
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible
-
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:34 pm
- Location: NW OKC OK USA
Re: NRC001-M
I'm afraid to try braid on that spool. I feel like I really ought to baby that thing. I've seen other guys say that it worked just fine on theirs, though.
I think I actually prefer the MB honeycomb to this one. Trouble is I can't test them in the same reel because my MB is for a Zonda.
This is the way.
-
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 6:27 pm
Re: NRC001-M
Wow, you prefer the zonda honeycomb to the m? I haven't used my honeycomb yet but I love my M. Guess I really better use that honeycomb before selling it.poisonokie wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:40 amI'm afraid to try braid on that spool. I feel like I really ought to baby that thing. I've seen other guys say that it worked just fine on theirs, though.
I think I actually prefer the MB honeycomb to this one. Trouble is I can't test them in the same reel because my MB is for a Zonda.
-
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 6:27 pm
Re: NRC001-M
Do you like the PG better than the r+ spool in the tdz?goldrod wrote: ↑Sat Oct 05, 2019 7:32 amOf recent times I brought some purple spools One of which was an SV 105 and the other an SV1012 they were the same but different and as I looked through my spool case I noticed that the G1 Spools are not only lighter ( they have cut outs in the middle) but the inductor was thinner. I have an ZPI M spool in a TDZ R+ and in a IS79 and its okay but to me the PG out shines the M spool. Maybe I am not doing something right but I'll go back to trying out different things. Right now my order of preference is the Kahen, PG, G1, M spool
Has anyone used braid on the M spool? I need some 40lb braid and may try it with the M spool.
Re: NRC001-M
I use braid on a M spool. Fits more than enough 30lb 832. Throw topwaters a lot with it. Lipless in the spring. Have used it for up to 1/2oz chatterbaits with no issues in a pinch. I should note I was not fishing heavy grass. I've used it to fish the chatterbaits around docks and light weeds at night. Below is an older thread regarding the usage of braid and the zpi nrc spools.
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=77621
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=77621