We have lots of weed and cover is thick.DavidSA wrote:Please post back with what you think of the power vs. your application. Over on BBC I have seen multiple Ontario anglers comment the 873 was not enough rod for the cover they fish. Granted they may fish different bodies of water.
NRX 894 vs NRX 873C
- cndbasshunter
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 4216
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:32 pm
- Location: CANADA
Re: NRX 894 vs NRX 873C
Re: NRX 894 vs NRX 873C
Got to try a spinner bait on an 873c this weekend, little too soft. Sounds like you made the right choice of the 894c.
Re: NRX 894 vs NRX 873C
My 894 will be at The Tackle Trap Wednesday, thanks Gary
Re: NRX 894 vs NRX 873C
You will enjoy the 894 Ryan but don't under estimate the 873. Some of the guys on here say it can't handle 3/4oz but I use a 3/4oz tungsten weight and a 3.5" craw for days each summer and pull fish out from that green slop and cover all day long, and that's with 22lb Fluoro not braid. The Aldebaran pulled the one of the 5lbr's of my trip out with ease, it's a little shorter so the accuracy for me is better than my 7'5" rods.
All in all can't go wrong, my next NRX will be the 894 for 1/2oz jig in the deep weed.
MTBF
All in all can't go wrong, my next NRX will be the 894 for 1/2oz jig in the deep weed.
MTBF