Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Reels are the hottest topic for TackleTour. Everyone wants to know what the latest and greatest is and how they compare to the old guard. What's the best for light stuff, or what's your suggestion for heavy cover. Do we really need different retrieve ratios? It's all in here.
Post Reply
freelancer27
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 8:08 am

Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by freelancer27 » Sun Nov 13, 2016 8:13 am

Hi guys,

I am looking for a new swimbait reel that I can use for bigger baits (2-8 oz) in Fresh and Saltwater.

My attention is right now on the Shimano Calcutta 400D and the Calcutta Conquest 400. I had a chance to test the Calcutta 400D over the weekend and really liked it overall.

Of course the fact that you can not adjust the brakes without unscrewing the side plates sucks a bit, though I am wondering how important that is for such bigger baits anyways.

What is your thought on this, is it worth to spend 200 USD more on the Conquest?


Thanks for your thoughts!

DenhamBruce
Senior Angler
Senior Angler
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:11 am

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by DenhamBruce » Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:21 am

Probably just go with the D series. I set and forget my Calcutta D you shouldn't need to be constantly changing the breaks with big baits like that.

godshippy
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 873
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:29 am

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by godshippy » Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:00 pm

I've got a 300D that I use for swimbaits and umbrella rigs. Honestly, I don't see why you would possibly need to adjust the brakes? The weights on the lures are so heavy anyway.

Dalleinf
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by Dalleinf » Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:51 pm

I have the conquest 101hg, calcutta 201D - 301D - and 401D. The Calcutta D's have two brakes activated and I never change the number of activated brakes.
If you feel like spending some $ get the Conquest. Otherwise the Calcutta Ds are great reels.

freelancer27
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by freelancer27 » Sun Nov 13, 2016 2:37 pm

Thanks guys!

Seems like the consensus is that the Calcutta Conquest is not necessarily worth the 200 USD more.

User avatar
cndbasshunter
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 4216
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:32 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by cndbasshunter » Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:58 pm

freelancer27 wrote:Thanks guys!

Seems like the consensus is that the Calcutta Conquest is not necessarily worth the 200 USD more.
:shock:

freelancer27
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1058
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by freelancer27 » Mon Nov 14, 2016 3:19 am

cndbasshunter wrote:
freelancer27 wrote:Thanks guys!

Seems like the consensus is that the Calcutta Conquest is not necessarily worth the 200 USD more.
:shock:
Why are you shocked by my comment?

mark poulson
TT Pro Angler
TT Pro Angler
Posts: 2746
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:28 am
Location: NorCal

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by mark poulson » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:39 am

Have you looked at the Cardiff 400? Same basic reel, .1 oz heavier, one more bearing, little more capacity, $100 cheaper.

User avatar
cndbasshunter
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 4216
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:32 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by cndbasshunter » Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:49 am

freelancer27 wrote:
cndbasshunter wrote:
freelancer27 wrote:Thanks guys!

Seems like the consensus is that the Calcutta Conquest is not necessarily worth the 200 USD more.
:shock:
Why are you shocked by my comment?
The D has too many plastic parts for my liking and i don't like the drag star.

mark poulson
TT Pro Angler
TT Pro Angler
Posts: 2746
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:28 am
Location: NorCal

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by mark poulson » Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:58 am

Correction. $250 cheaper. Wow!

karirick
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:33 am

Re: Shimano Calcutta 400D vs Calcutta Conquest 400

Post by karirick » Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:11 am

mark poulson wrote:Correction. $250 cheaper. Wow!
This site is not normally the best place to ask "is this higher end reel worth $$$ more than a model or 2 down :D ", but I will say the Conquest is probably one of those extra special reels that is a true notch above in almost every way if someone has the budget to get one.

I've barely fished my Conquest or Calcutta D's, but I literally smile when I pick up the Conquest, it may be the finest piece of fishing equipment I personally have ever held in my hands, including my Stella's.

You can't go wrong with either for sure, so good luck with whatever you purchase.

Rick

Post Reply