Metanium mgl vs chronarch mgl thread

Reels are the hottest topic for TackleTour. Everyone wants to know what the latest and greatest is and how they compare to the old guard. What's the best for light stuff, or what's your suggestion for heavy cover. Do we really need different retrieve ratios? It's all in here.
-Boris-
Senior Angler
Senior Angler
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 11:51 pm
Location: Berlin - Germany

Re: Metanium mgl vs chronarch mgl thread

Post by -Boris- » Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:55 am

y2k88 wrote:
-Boris- wrote:Does anybody know the weight difference between the aluminium and brass gear? Thank you very much for the information! :)
6.2 MGL - 5.4 grams
6.2 K - 14.3 grams
Thank you very much!

The difference is smaller than expected.
More pictures: https://www.instagram.com/addicted_to_baitcaster/

Strewth
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Metanium mgl vs chronarch mgl thread

Post by Strewth » Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:43 am

A saving of just 9g does not justify the grief that alloy gears can give. Just wish they would stick with brass.

mark poulson
TT Pro Angler
TT Pro Angler
Posts: 2745
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:28 am
Location: NorCal

Re: Metanium mgl vs chronarch mgl thread

Post by mark poulson » Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:31 am

Strewth wrote:A saving of just 9g does not justify the grief that alloy gears can give. Just wish they would stick with brass.
Amen!!!

Post Reply