Sunline Super Natural
Sunline Super Natural
What's y'alls thoughts ? Is it as good or better than Big Game ?
Re: Sunline Super Natural
Super Natural is softer and a much smaller diameter than Big Game for the same test rating. I don't care for the dark green color of Super Natural. It needs to be lighter. I would fish the clear over the dark green if you are fishing the top half of the water column.
Re: Sunline Super Natural
Thanks , Todd. I picked up some 20 lb clear , it's the same diameter as 15 lb big game. Gonna try it on my worm/senko rod.
Re: Sunline Super Natural
In case you haven't seen it: Sunline Super Natural Review
Cal, Managing Editor
"fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside"
"fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside"
Re: Sunline Super Natural
Didn't know that was there.thx
-
- Elite Angler
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:21 pm
Re: Sunline Super Natural
I like it but as otherwise stated you need to go up in LB test rating. I normally throw 10 or 12lb mono (Trilene XL) and I had to go up to 14lb super natural. Good line for the money as long as you are aware of the diameter vs pound test rating compared to other lines.
- Hogsticker2
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: Sunline Super Natural
I never have used this line. I'm too stuck on original Defier. If I made the switch, would I be -
1) OK
2) Somewhat satisfied
3) Moderately disappointed
4) Monumentally pissed off
1) OK
2) Somewhat satisfied
3) Moderately disappointed
4) Monumentally pissed off
- GOOD YEAR 71
- Elite Angler
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:07 pm
- Location: NorCal
Re: Sunline Super Natural
In my humble opinion...
3) Moderately disappointed
or
4) Monumentally pissed off
Now, in Super Natural defense there isn't anything 'bad' about it. But comparing it to Defier isn't fair. They're on a different level. Defier you fish until you know you shouldn't and then you swap. Super Natural you fish until you realize you have to check it constant then realize you have no choice but to swap for fits of sheer safety. String it up, fish it, no worry. But it won't last long and it's not as reliable. But it's cheap, which from cost perspective is not such a horrible thing. But you won't necessarily save money while running increased risk of potential breakoff. Again, just my opinion, but I did give it a run and my spools didn't last very long. I used both in several test at one time or another. Cost difference or no cost difference I would chose Defier.
3) Moderately disappointed
or
4) Monumentally pissed off
Now, in Super Natural defense there isn't anything 'bad' about it. But comparing it to Defier isn't fair. They're on a different level. Defier you fish until you know you shouldn't and then you swap. Super Natural you fish until you realize you have to check it constant then realize you have no choice but to swap for fits of sheer safety. String it up, fish it, no worry. But it won't last long and it's not as reliable. But it's cheap, which from cost perspective is not such a horrible thing. But you won't necessarily save money while running increased risk of potential breakoff. Again, just my opinion, but I did give it a run and my spools didn't last very long. I used both in several test at one time or another. Cost difference or no cost difference I would chose Defier.
PEACE
Re: Sunline Super Natural
Yep. What he said.GOOD YEAR 71 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2020 12:49 pmIn my humble opinion...
3) Moderately disappointed
or
4) Monumentally pissed off
Now, in Super Natural defense there isn't anything 'bad' about it. But comparing it to Defier isn't fair. They're on a different level. Defier you fish until you know you shouldn't and then you swap. Super Natural you fish until you realize you have to check it constant then realize you have no choice but to swap for fits of sheer safety. String it up, fish it, no worry. But it won't last long and it's not as reliable. But it's cheap, which from cost perspective is not such a horrible thing. But you won't necessarily save money while running increased risk of potential breakoff. Again, just my opinion, but I did give it a run and my spools didn't last very long. I used both in several test at one time or another. Cost difference or no cost difference I would chose Defier.
- Hogsticker2
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: Sunline Super Natural
I trust your opinion..... when it comes to line anywaysGOOD YEAR 71 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2020 12:49 pmIn my humble opinion...
3) Moderately disappointed
or
4) Monumentally pissed off
Now, in Super Natural defense there isn't anything 'bad' about it. But comparing it to Defier isn't fair. They're on a different level. Defier you fish until you know you shouldn't and then you swap. Super Natural you fish until you realize you have to check it constant then realize you have no choice but to swap for fits of sheer safety. String it up, fish it, no worry. But it won't last long and it's not as reliable. But it's cheap, which from cost perspective is not such a horrible thing. But you won't necessarily save money while running increased risk of potential breakoff. Again, just my opinion, but I did give it a run and my spools didn't last very long. I used both in several test at one time or another. Cost difference or no cost difference I would chose Defier.
Re: Sunline Super Natural
I change line often. Probably just spool up this worm rod with Sniper next. Wanted to try this out because it was cheap lol.
Re: Sunline Super Natural
There’s much better mono and copoly available that’s priced the same or better. Defier is great line but the price is a huge negative for a mono
Legend Alpha 211/Merc 250 Pro XS
- Hogsticker2
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm
-
- TT Moderator
- Posts: 6803
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:56 pm
- Location: Oxford GA
Re: Sunline Super Natural
I'll mention two of my favorites-sufix elite and p-line cxx.Hogsticker2 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 09, 2020 2:45 pmSubjective, though I'd like to hear which lines you're referring to.
Try not to let your mind wander. It is much too small to be outside unsupervised.