QUAKEnSHAKE wrote:Makes my 2003 $70 Pinnacle seem all the better cause its able to get measured10'-13' farther with an even lighter 2.3g lure.
so are you stating that it's the performance of the $70 reel that makes the difference?
and that you reached this conclusion based on a "comparison" where:
the anglers
the reels
the rods
the fishing line
the locations
are all DIFFERENT?
obviously not everyone has access to lab conditions but at the very least can't we stay within the definition of "scientific method"?
when just about all the variables are different i'm not sure what benefit you get from these observations...
QUAKEnSHAKE wrote:
A person with lesser baitcasting abilities would find it improbable. Please dont project your lack of skill with a baitcaster onto others.
hold on... so it's not the &70 reel, it's actually the individual's baitcasting abilities that made the difference?
hopefully we see a vid of what it takes to get a $70 reel to outcast a $400 reel using 2.3g!