I think price should be left out of TT review score

Anything and everything related to fishing tackle. If you cannot find the sub-category for your topic, go ahead and post it in here!
Post Reply
KP Duty
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 667
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 5:52 pm

I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by KP Duty » Thu Feb 09, 2023 1:32 pm

You can have yearly 'best value' awards for products that perform well at a resonable price (like 'car & driver' or 'consumer reports' does), but I feel reviews should only factor in build quality and performance. I'm sure some people don't even read the full review (like my bro) and would say 'they gave my steez a 7/10, a lower rating than the Tatula'...what a crock! JMO of course....

User avatar
Hogsticker2
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 7161
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by Hogsticker2 » Thu Feb 09, 2023 7:09 pm

I think price to performance thoughts fine myself. We all know about diminishing returns. Then again, a portion of all reviews are subjective. We all have our preferences and like what we like.

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Fri Feb 10, 2023 4:48 am

I see where you are coming from, as sometimes MSRP is a decent margin higher than street price. I do like to look at "cost to performance" as a factor for tackle. It was mentioned about diminishing returns, which we can see through a little easier than the typical angler.

You will see in an upcoming reel review how cost definitely is a factor. I went though a few different thoughts on how to factor price into the review. The release of a similar reel really changed my perception regarding price score.
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

User avatar
njbasscat
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 2451
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:28 am
Location: Southern NJ

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by njbasscat » Fri Feb 10, 2023 8:53 am

I think you need the price listed in the review. As an example, I expect more out of an Exist than I do a Certate. If you compare the two head to head without considering the price, the Exist wins without question. Put price into the equation and it changes. Could you compare a $500 plus rod to a $200 rod without knowing the prices? The components alone make the higher-dollar rod better quality. I like to know what I'm getting for the price I'm paying.

User avatar
LowRange
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 4784
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:18 am

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by LowRange » Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:00 am

Cal does a pretty good job of referencing price when rating a reel without digging into the "best reel for $X" firestorm.

gambler2100
Angler
Angler
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:52 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by gambler2100 » Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:11 am

One has to realize that giving a Tatula a 9/10 and a Steez an 8/10 doesn't mean the Tatula is a better reel. The ratings need to be observed within the range of product offering ie. comparing Acura to Honda or Volkswagen to Audi is not fair. If you compare a certain Steez model to another Steez model the rating becomes relevant. In other words products need to be compared to competitive products in the same Tier . . . just my 2cents worth!

KP Duty
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 667
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 5:52 pm

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by KP Duty » Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:24 am

gambler2100 wrote:
Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:11 am
One has to realize that giving a Tatula a 9/10 and a Steez an 8/10 doesn't mean the Tatula is a better reel. The ratings need to be observed within the range of product offering ie. comparing Acura to Honda or Volkswagen to Audi is not fair. If you compare a certain Steez model to another Steez model the rating becomes relevant. In other words products need to be compared to competitive products in the same Tier . . . just my 2cents worth!
I get that. However, the '23 Corvette Z06 @ $130k got a 10/10 from Car and Driver....what you'd expect. Camaro ZL1@70k received a 9/10...also about what you'd expect. Maybe TT just deducts too many points for price. If Tackle Tour reviewed cars, there is no way they would give a Ferrari 296gtb a 9.6/10, because it's $370k. It would probably get a 7/10 like an Evergreen RS.

KP Duty
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 667
Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 5:52 pm

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by KP Duty » Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:33 am

gambler2100 wrote:
Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:11 am
One has to realize that giving a Tatula a 9/10 and a Steez an 8/10 doesn't mean the Tatula is a better reel. The ratings need to be observed within the range of product offering ie. comparing Acura to Honda or Volkswagen to Audi is not fair. If you compare a certain Steez model to another Steez model the rating becomes relevant. In other words products need to be compared to competitive products in the same Tier . . . just my 2cents worth!
I get that. Maybe TT just deducts too many points for price. If Tackle Tour reviewed cars, there is no way they would give a Ferrari 296gtb a 9.6/10 like C&D did, because it's $370k. It would probably get a 7/10 like an Evergreen RS.

DirtyD64
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3050
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 4:23 pm

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by DirtyD64 » Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:50 pm

I'd like to see price ranges/what's offered taken into consideration versus just price.

For example a Steez SVTW would be in the higher priced class, would directly compete with the $500 range Shimano or Abu reels, and then tell which one offers most at that point.

I just remember the Alphas SVTW scoring low on price cause it was like $300 range. I got mine for almost half that and feel it is one of the best deals I've ever had on a reel, especially how high things are now. I know my story takes JDM price into consideration, but so do a lot of enthusiast anglers.

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Wed Mar 15, 2023 11:10 am

Should price score be comparative to other reels in the price point? An issue would be that the first reel in a generation (say Daiwa pumps out a new Steez before Shimano does an Antares and such). Would it be fair for that new Steez to get a better price score because it is better than the competition?

At the end of the day, we all think "Is this reel worth the money?". That is hard to define to the individual because someone may think the laws of diminishing returns start at say the Tatula range of reels. The next angler may value flat out performance more than cost-to-performace.

Also, TT reviews are not a collective project. One person does the review. Although is a structure of sorts with sections, grading criteria and such, there is still a subjective nature to it...I think that makes the review a little more useful for people overall. Without it, any review would just be a regurgitation of specs with a side of measuring performance data in an overly controlled environment that would be a misrepresentation of the highly variable conditions that is as anglers face.

The KastKing Kestrel Elite is a great example of pricing affecting overall score quite a bit due to a subjective thought. I think the Kestrel Elite in a vacuum is a great value for the money. For about $30-$40 more than the Curado BFS, the Kestrel Elite is better in almost every way by a long shot. I looked at the Kestrel Elite as quite high for a price score...at first anyway. KastKing released a reel called the Valiant Eagle II in their overseas market. For about 1/3 of the price, you get the same frame, spool, brakes...basically performance of the Kestrel Elite. Biggest difference is frame material and bearing count. Hell, both reels even came with the same big grease blob on the spool shaft bearing :lol: . That reduced my score for price because anglers can get VERY similar performance at way less price. If the angler values smaller reel weight, could be worth the increase in price.

The best way to see if a product is for you is to get it yourself and use it. Could be a reel, waders or even a lawnmower. That is foolish and unrealistic strategy to do for every product We look to buy in life. We look up rating and reviews, watch videos and search the web for information about a product to decide to buy or not. We have to take the many opinions of people we come across, evaluate that info and make a determination to buy/pass.
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

User avatar
LowRange
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 4784
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:18 am

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by LowRange » Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:22 am

Other than a few rare comparisons TT does not get into the reel comparison crap storm. I don't take and number from a point system to mean that any reel is better than another. You're bench racing reels at that point. The review is there to get you a look at the insides, some spool weights and idea of smoothness and some idea of casting.

I wish skipping and braking profile was discussed in each review. I have to decipher the braking profile based on the impressions of the reviewer. Cal seems to like freer casting profiles having repeatedly spoken highly of MGL and older Pixy/Alphas Magforce V/Z and has not exactly been warm to SV spooled reels. Zander seems to be the opposite and will often speak highly about how a reel can cast well even with a strong backlash resistance profile brake setting. See his remarks about how well the Curado DC would cast even when set thumb free or his 17 Tatula SV reviews.

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:32 pm

LowRange wrote:
Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:22 am
Other than a few rare comparisons TT does not get into the reel comparison crap storm. I don't take and number from a point system to mean that any reel is better than another. You're bench racing reels at that point. The review is there to get you a look at the insides, some spool weights and idea of smoothness and some idea of casting.

I wish skipping and braking profile was discussed in each review. I have to decipher the braking profile based on the impressions of the reviewer. Cal seems to like freer casting profiles having repeatedly spoken highly of MGL and older Pixy/Alphas Magforce V/Z and has not exactly been warm to SV spooled reels. Zander seems to be the opposite and will often speak highly about how a reel can cast well even with a strong backlash resistance profile brake setting. See his remarks about how well the Curado DC would cast even when set thumb free or his 17 Tatula SV reviews.
You make some interesting points. Although there isn't a completely objective way to do reviews, it's a good thing the subjectivity on the TackleTour reviews are limited to the user's preference/experience versus factors like money, sponsors and such.

I agree with the subject nature of user preference. After fishing with Zander's gear, I know what you say is true in a sense. Most reels I found myself loosening up the brakes a little. That doesn't mean I cast better or further, just a different casting stroke. Same goes with rods. Some people like casting fast action rods vs moderate. If they have a naturally snappy casting motion, the faster action will react better. If it's a slower casting motion, the moderate rod will feel better.

I can say I didn't have the same experience with the Gekkabijin AIR TW as Cal did. Reading his review, I wouldn't say what he is saying is wrong by any means, it is just different experience and uses. I find getting reviews and experience from multiple sources often paints the best picture for me to purchase.

Skipping and braking profile I think makes it's way into reviews when they naturally do. I included it in my Kestrel Elite review because it stood out to me and was worth mentioning. My Silver Creek AIR TW review, it's does ok but, the majority of users are not getting that reel to skip so, I decided to have open water and stream sections of the review.

I try to incorporate longer term thoughts in my written reviews. I generally do my videos as initial impression type information and put my longer term thoughts into a written review. That makes each source of information true in the moment and, distinguishable enough from each other that they aren't just a regurgitation of each other.

Price score is mostly regarding just that reviewed piece of tackle being worth the money for what you get. There may be a mental comparison to other like priced reels to help determine the price score but, nothing like "Tatula vs Curado :shock: " type hype. I guess in an odd way of saying, you wouldn't openly compare your wife to your ex girlfriends :lol: .

With many outlets people share their experiences nowadays, the info is there. There are just some people's opinions I place more weight on than others.
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

evilcatfish
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:47 pm
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by evilcatfish » Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:06 pm

If you enjoy wine, you may be familiar with QPR or “quality price ratio.” A $10 bottle or $100+ bottle could score well in this category, just depends on how it performs. I definitely think this is something to consider in TT reviews, though perhaps it should have a little less influence than other categories? I dunno 🤷‍♂️

Now if only there were a way to do “blind testing” like you can have a blind beverage tasting, then we’d get some interesting info. I’ve seen enthusiasts become upset when they score a “lesser” wine/bourbon/etc better than more hyped offerings. I myself wonder, would I think more highly of a bps rod if it said evergreen on it? Or think less of an evergreen if it was bps branded?

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:35 pm

evilcatfish wrote:
Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:06 pm
If you enjoy wine, you may be familiar with QPR or “quality price ratio.” A $10 bottle or $100+ bottle could score well in this category, just depends on how it performs. I definitely think this is something to consider in TT reviews, though perhaps it should have a little less influence than other categories? I dunno 🤷‍♂️

Now if only there were a way to do “blind testing” like you can have a blind beverage tasting, then we’d get some interesting info. I’ve seen enthusiasts become upset when they score a “lesser” wine/bourbon/etc better than more hyped offerings. I myself wonder, would I think more highly of a bps rod if it said evergreen on it? Or think less of an evergreen if it was bps branded?
Store brand rods aren't half bad. Most times, they are made by a reputable rod company. You can see the influence from a company by looking closely at the store brand.

QPR is something I like to look at. The Tatula series is about the best there is for me. Does about 90% of what higher end reels can do at way less price. Is my whole lineup Tatulas??? Nope...this is TackleTour :lol:
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

User avatar
Carlos Carrapiço
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:22 am

Re: I think price should be left out of TT review score

Post by Carlos Carrapiço » Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:35 am

KP Duty wrote:
Thu Feb 09, 2023 1:32 pm
You can have yearly 'best value' awards for products that perform well at a resonable price (like 'car & driver' or 'consumer reports' does), but I feel reviews should only factor in build quality and performance. I'm sure some people don't even read the full review (like my bro) and would say 'they gave my steez a 7/10, a lower rating than the Tatula'...what a crock! JMO of course....
I agree. =D>

Post Reply