Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

When production rods are not enough, it's time to go custom. Come share your experiences building and/or ordering a custom rod and tell us if you'll ever go back to off the shelf.
Post Reply
d510addict
Angler
Angler
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:20 pm

Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by d510addict » Tue May 09, 2023 6:49 am

Hello,
I'm building a rod for sub quarter ounce Ned's and quarter ounce top waters for Smallmouth Bass. Fish will mostly be on the small side but could be up to 18 or 19 inches. Intend to use an SLX BFS until I can find a more substantial finesse baitcaster. Which of these blanks would you recommend?

hoohoorjoo
TT Moderator
TT Moderator
Posts: 6801
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:56 pm
Location: Oxford GA

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by hoohoorjoo » Tue May 09, 2023 7:00 pm

Assuming those are popping blanks, I'd go 842. Those Batson popping blanks are moderate and don't have huge power down low.
Try not to let your mind wander. It is much too small to be outside unsupervised.

d510addict
Angler
Angler
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:20 pm

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by d510addict » Tue May 09, 2023 8:07 pm

Yea it's their poping blanks. I've been hunting for CCS data....I'm feeling like it doesn't really take into account how action affects power. I've seen BIG fish landed on moderate blanks with not so much power in the top half. Spoke with Kerry Batson, he agrees with you 2 or 3 power for Bass.just trying to not end up with another power Bass rod.

User avatar
Hogsticker2
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 7170
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by Hogsticker2 » Tue May 09, 2023 10:36 pm

842 for sure

hoohoorjoo
TT Moderator
TT Moderator
Posts: 6801
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:56 pm
Location: Oxford GA

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by hoohoorjoo » Wed May 10, 2023 5:08 pm

d510addict wrote:
Tue May 09, 2023 8:07 pm
Yea it's their poping blanks. I've been hunting for CCS data....I'm feeling like it doesn't really take into account how action affects power. I've seen BIG fish landed on moderate blanks with not so much power in the top half. Spoke with Kerry Batson, he agrees with you 2 or 3 power for Bass.just trying to not end up with another power Bass rod.
I have a custom built on the 7' 0 power Immortal popping blank. It will load and launch a 2 gram crankbait into low-earth orbit with a SS Air. It is moderate action at best. It has Ti/SiC micros on it to minimize the guides affecting to blank. I've also had a custom built on the IP845 blank, and it was a medium+ power at best.
Try not to let your mind wander. It is much too small to be outside unsupervised.

User avatar
Hogsticker2
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 7170
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by Hogsticker2 » Wed May 10, 2023 8:36 pm

hoohoorjoo wrote:
Wed May 10, 2023 5:08 pm
d510addict wrote:
Tue May 09, 2023 8:07 pm
Yea it's their poping blanks. I've been hunting for CCS data....I'm feeling like it doesn't really take into account how action affects power. I've seen BIG fish landed on moderate blanks with not so much power in the top half. Spoke with Kerry Batson, he agrees with you 2 or 3 power for Bass.just trying to not end up with another power Bass rod.
I have a custom built on the 7' 0 power Immortal popping blank. It will load and launch a 2 gram crankbait into low-earth orbit with a SS Air. It is moderate action at best. It has Ti/SiC micros on it to minimize the guides affecting to blank. I've also had a custom built on the IP845 blank, and it was a medium+ power at best.
I have the 844 I sometime use for lighter lipless cranks and top water baits. I'd probably call it a medium powered blank. Use to be my jerkbait stick until I found the Point Blank 701mf.

MikeK
Senior Angler
Senior Angler
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:53 am
Location: Chuluota, FL

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by MikeK » Thu May 11, 2023 5:17 pm

RX6 SP842 has RDA power 203 grams

d510addict
Angler
Angler
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2022 5:20 pm

Re: Rainshadow SP841 or 842 - Smallmouth

Post by d510addict » Sat May 20, 2023 5:48 pm

Right now with an NFC glass rod and an Xray mb 733 I feel I'm stuck either too light or too heavy. Are these blanks thst light? Or does the power just kick in lower? 1/4 oz and up the 733 will do. But thst glass rod is a buggy whip up top then locks up.

Post Reply